<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Progress for America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressforamerica.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressforamerica.org</link>
	<description>News, politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly blasts &#8216;Law and Order&#8217; creator Dick Wolf</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/12/12/bill-oreilly-blasts-law-and-order-creator-dick-wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/12/12/bill-oreilly-blasts-law-and-order-creator-dick-wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
On his Thursday night segment &#8216;O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8217;, the political pundit blasted &#8216;Law and Order&#8217; creator Dick Wolf by calling him a &#8220;despicable human&#8221; being whose long-running series is &#8220;out of control&#8221;.
What did Dick Wolf do?
In this week&#8217;s episode of the spin-off &#8216;Law and Order: SVU&#8217;, a major character played by John Larroquette (of Night [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- Disqus: replace closed comments only --> <!-- content nav --></p>
<p>On his Thursday night segment &#8216;O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8217;, the political pundit blasted &#8216;Law and Order&#8217; creator Dick Wolf by calling him a &#8220;despicable human&#8221; being whose long-running series is &#8220;out of control&#8221;.</p>
<p>What did Dick Wolf do?</p>
<p>In this week&#8217;s episode of the spin-off &#8216;Law and Order: SVU&#8217;, a major character played by John Larroquette (of Night Court fame) uttered the following lines when talking to an on-screen detective, &#8220;Limbaugh, Beck, O&#8217;Reilly, all of them, they are like a cancer spreading ignorance and hate&#8230;&#8221; and that O&#8217;Reilly was against immigrants and those who could not afford health care.</p>
<p>According to Bill, the clip was a &#8220;defamatory and outrageous&#8221; segment.  To counter it, he had his producers air clips from past episodes of his show that featured the host drawing attention to helping the poor and those &#8220;who want a better life. &#8221;</p>
<div id="alpha-inner" class="pkg">
<div id="entry-6a00d83451d69069e201287647a4d2970c" class="entry">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body"></div>
<div class="entry-more">
<p>When reporters called on Wolf, he would not comment on these criticisms.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/12/12/bill-oreilly-blasts-law-and-order-creator-dick-wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iranian Government Holds 3 Americans</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/08/02/iranian-government-holds-3-americans/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/08/02/iranian-government-holds-3-americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[American tourists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Iranian government, via state-sponsored television, has announced that they are holding three Americans captive. The three Americans alleged entered Iran via the Iraqi border near the Kurdish region, which is poorly delineated and heavily mountainous.  State television claims that Iranian police near the town of Amed Awaa, in Kurdish Iraq, had warned the Americans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iranian government, via state-sponsored television, has announced that they are holding three Americans captive. The three Americans alleged entered Iran via the Iraqi border near the Kurdish region, which is poorly delineated and heavily mountainous.  State television claims that Iranian police near the town of Amed Awaa, in Kurdish Iraq, had warned the Americans not to enter Iran.  The events which led to their possibly inadvertent entry are still unclear.  <span class="body"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span class="body">A second source, a government official of Kurdish Iraq, has also weighed on what happened.  According to the Kurdish official, the three tourists had come to Amed Awaa for sight-seeing.  Soon thereafter, on a hike to nearby natural scenery, the three strayed into Iranian territory and were quickly taken by Iranian soldiers.<br />
It is likely that the three tourists could not have known that they had strayed in Iranian territory, as maps would have been useless in what is an extremely poorly marked mountainous region.</p>
<p>The State Department is unable to communicate with the Iranian government due to lack of diplomatic connections between the two countries.  However, the Swiss government has acted as a liason in the past and is expected to do so again to mediate the matter.</span></p>
<p>Iran is still in the grip of civil turmoil after recent protests against disputed election results.  It is unclear whether this had an impact on the rapid arrest of the three American tourists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/08/02/iranian-government-holds-3-americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid Vacations Forced by Federal Government?</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/05/29/paid-vacations-forced-by-federal-government/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/05/29/paid-vacations-forced-by-federal-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[grayson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paid vacations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florida Dem Alan Grayson has introduced a bill into Congress proposing that companies with more than 100 employees should be required to give paid vacations of approximately 7 days to all employees.  Grayson finds it outrageous that Americans work longer and harder than Europeans, and believes federally mandated vacations would help the average American worker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida Dem Alan Grayson has introduced a bill into Congress proposing that companies with more than 100 employees should be required to give paid vacations of approximately 7 days to all employees.  Grayson finds it outrageous that Americans work longer and harder than Europeans, and believes federally mandated vacations would help the average American worker relax as well as stimulate the economy because it would become a source of income for companies working in the holiday industry.</p>
<p>It is unclear why companies with 99 employees or less are exempt, and may instead fuel a rapid increase in companies with just under 100 employees.  Moreover, Grayson&#8217;s own constituency of Florida, a vacation hotspot, may stand to gain most from such a bill should it pass.  For all others, such a bill may instead end up becoming a cost, partly passed onto consumers by the companies themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/05/29/paid-vacations-forced-by-federal-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea missile launch filmed</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/07/north-korea-missile-launch-filmed/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/07/north-korea-missile-launch-filmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nuclear missile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK newspaper Telegraph is reporting that the North Korean missile launch this week was captured by U.S. satellites.  In photos, the exhaust trail of a rocket streaked across the sky can be seen against the backdrop of East Korea Bay in North Korea.  North Korea launched what was ostensibly a rocket for satellite-delivery, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK newspaper Telegraph is reporting that the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/5121945/North-Korean-missile-launch-captured-by-US-satellite.html">North Korean missile launch </a>this week was captured by U.S. satellites.  In photos, the exhaust trail of a rocket streaked across the sky can be seen against the backdrop of East Korea Bay in North Korea.  North Korea launched what was ostensibly a rocket for satellite-delivery, which has been widely perceived as a thinly veiled display of its ability to project intercontinental ballistic missiles across the Pacific ocean.  The story is complicated by the fact that no satellite was detected post-launch, and the latter stages of the rocket fell far short of reaching North American soil.  However, most world leaders have expressed deep concerns with North Korea&#8217;s continuing activities in developing nuclear weapons, given its history of trading away missile technology to so-called &#8220;rogue states&#8221;.</p>
<p>In 2006, North Korea previously launched a missile over Japanese territory, causing tremendous alarm and consternation in both the Japanese and South Korean governments.  The United States, since World War II, has assumed the role of defender for Japan and continues to station troops in South Korea.  The launch of what could be an intercontinental ballistic missile seemingly places American interests at jeopardy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/07/north-korea-missile-launch-filmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tedisco, Murphy race too close to call</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/01/tedisco-murphy-race-too-close-to-call/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/01/tedisco-murphy-race-too-close-to-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tedisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a race that was supposed to be decided Tuesday night, the vote count is much too close to call. Democratic candidate Scott Murphy has the edge of a mere 59 votes over Republican candidate Jim Tedisco.  Given that the total vote count is 154,629, the razor thin margin just 0.03% of all votes.
Although the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a race that was supposed to be decided Tuesday night, the vote count is <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2009/03/30/daily25.html">much too close to call.</a> Democratic candidate Scott Murphy has the edge of a mere <strong>59</strong> votes over Republican candidate Jim Tedisco.  Given that the total vote count is 154,629, the razor thin margin just 0.03% of all votes.</p>
<p>Although the 20th Congressional District has been solidly Republican in recent years, the changing fortunes of the Republican party meant that Murphy, a venture capitalist with no experience in politics, has a solid chance of snatching the election from his opponent.</p>
<p>In all likelihood, absentee ballots will now decide the race, but as of Wednesday none of them have been counted.  It is said that 10,000 of the absentee ballots were <a href="http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20090401/NEWS01/904010351/1006">sent out</a>, and of those, 6000 have been returned.  These remaining ballots are expected to be counted by April 13th.</p>
<p>The New York Times reports that both candidates have <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/millions-spent-on-upstate-house-fight/">spent heavy sums of money</a> in this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/04/01/tedisco-murphy-race-too-close-to-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tedisco vs. Murphy race close</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/tedisco-vs-murphy-race-close/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/tedisco-vs-murphy-race-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tedisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of March 31st 10pm ET, the special election race in the 20th Congressional District (New York) between Tedisco, a Republican leader of the State Assembly, and Murphy, a venture capitalist green to politics, appears to be a close one. The winner will take the place of Kirsten Gillibrand, a Representative of the House, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of March 31st 10pm ET, the special election race in the 20th Congressional District (New York) between Tedisco, a Republican leader of the State Assembly, and Murphy, a venture capitalist green to politics, appears to be a close one. The winner will take the place of Kirsten Gillibrand, a Representative of the House, who in turn will take the spot vacated by Hillary Clinton upon her appointment as Secretary of State to the Obama administration.</p>
<p>Whereas in past years the 20th Congressional District has been strongly Republican, in recent years Republicans have been on the defensive.  Late into the night, Tedisco was <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/tedisco-hustles-in-campaigns-final-hours/">still seen campaigning</a>.</p>
<p>Tedisco and Murphy have been squaring off each other on recent national issues, such as the gargantuan stimulus package pushed through Congress with nudging by President Obama and the AIG bailout.  Tedisco has attacked Murphy for his support of the stimulus money that has ostensibly led to the bonus packages for AIG executives that were perceived to be outrageously high.</p>
<p>Results are expected to be a bellweather for Republican prospects later this year and in 2010, and are <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE52U0X420090331">expected to emerge late</a> Tuesday evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/tedisco-vs-murphy-race-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No path for U.S. to prevent North Korean missile test?</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/no-path-for-us-to-prevent-north-korean-missile-test/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/no-path-for-us-to-prevent-north-korean-missile-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[missile test]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secretary of defense Gates says there is little the U.S. can do to respond to North Korea&#8217;s impending missile test.  North Korea last sent a missile sailing over the islands of Japan in 2006.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secretary of defense Gates says there is <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/29/gates-prepared-respond-north-korea-missile-launch/">little the U.S. can do</a> to respond to North Korea&#8217;s impending missile test.  North Korea last sent a missile sailing over the islands of Japan in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/31/no-path-for-us-to-prevent-north-korean-missile-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama town hall: campaign backers posing as questioners!</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/obama-town-hall-campaign-backers-posing-as-questioners/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/obama-town-hall-campaign-backers-posing-as-questioners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[town hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama talks of &#8220;engaging critics&#8221;, but looks like the critics were just disguised supporters, as reported by Washington Post.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama talks of &#8220;engaging critics&#8221;, but looks like the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/03/27/obama_town_hall_questioners_we.html">critics were just disguised supporters</a>, as reported by <em>Washington Post</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/obama-town-hall-campaign-backers-posing-as-questioners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20th Congressional district race: Tedisco vs. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/20th-congressional-district-race-tedisco-vs-murphy/</link>
		<comments>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/20th-congressional-district-race-tedisco-vs-murphy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drpolitics</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congressional]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tedisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressforamerica.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New York, a special election Congressional race between Republican James N. Tedisco and Democrat Scott Murphy is heating up.  Murphy is a venture capitalist who’s never held office, supports the federal stimulus package and touts his experience with creating jobs through his investments in start-ups.   His opponent Tedisco is an Assemblyman who is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York, a special election Congressional race between Republican James N. Tedisco and Democrat Scott Murphy is heating up.  Murphy is a venture capitalist who’s never held office, supports the federal stimulus package and touts his experience with creating jobs through his investments in start-ups.   His opponent Tedisco is an Assemblyman who is a long term resident of Albany.  Between the two, the issue of AIG bonuses has exploded to the forefront.  Apparently, Tedisco’s tactic is to take this opportunity to pin blame for the AIG fiasco on Murphy, for Murphy’s support of the stimulus which ostensibly led to the bonus furore.</p>
<p>More <a href="http//www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/nyregion/28election.html?hp">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://progressforamerica.org/2009/03/28/20th-congressional-district-race-tedisco-vs-murphy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
